Grey Swan

Preventative Health? Time for new Measures

Posted by Grey Swan on Thursday, August 9th, 2007

I recently canvassed several interns who are working on preventative health measures in D.C. and asked if there was any new ideas being tossed about. They said “No”. This got me thinking - with all the talk about preventing future illness, why are so few ideas tossed about in public? In order to get this [...]

continue reading

The Problem with Free College Tuition (College Wars Part I)

Posted by Grey Swan on Saturday, June 9th, 2007

Many European countries offer free education to those who want it. The idea is that education is good, and the more educated people get, the better. Since education is costly however, this is not necessarily true.
The main problem with education is that it is a partially zero-sum pursuit.
While classes in computer science and engineering may [...]

continue reading

IQ and Income

Posted by Grey Swan on Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

I used data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to examine how IQ affects income. The survey takes a set of young people in 1979 (late teens to early twenties) and interviews them on a broad range of issues every few years. While surveys have continued beyond 1996, I only have data up to [...]

continue reading

IQ and Income

Posted by Grey Swan on Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

income-iq-year.png

I used data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to examine how IQ affects income. The survey takes a set of young people in 1979 (late teens to early twenties) and interviews them on a broad range of issues every few years. While surveys have continued beyond 1996, I only have data up to that year.

In the simple linear regression of Income vs. IQ a clear trend emerges - income diverges by IQ as we age*. This may seem counterintuitive - doesn’t raw intellect matter less and less as we get older? Apparently the answer is no. Perhaps this is because the smartest people continue learning at a faster rate as they age, or perhaps this is because it takes a while for there salary to catch up to the value of work produced. E.G., A McDonalds employee is unlikely to be paid below the value of their production. However, many financial companies use strongly hierarchal structures that effectually underpay recent college graduates. Adoption studies confirm a similar trend: Adopted children’s financial outcome decreasingly correlates with their adoptive parents and increasingly correlates with tested aptitude.

What about education? The problem with controlling for education in the data is that smart people tend to get educated more. Anyone with an IQ over 130 who fails to graduate college likely has other uncontrolled variables that decrease their income outlook. Consequently, we would expect a systematic downward bias in our results. Running the regressions shows just this - IQ decreases in importance but continues to be important.

The unfortunate aspect of the above analysis is that education matters less than many people think. Spending more and more on education meets decreasing returns because the raw material – the people who are being educated – stays the same.

*Note that IQ only explains about 15 percent of all variation in income - other factors continue to be very important.

Posted in: Education, Featured, Financial, Genetics, Society.

One Response to “IQ and Income”

  1. Half Sigma Says:

    You have the cause and effect wrong.

    Education is what enables people to get onto a career track that allows them to earn more money as they grow older.

    The primary means by which IQ causes higher income is indirect: IQ causes longer and more prestigious education, and the education leads to the career track, and the career track leads to higher income.

Leave a Reply